Coping Strategies For KidsCoping Strategies Questionnaire Csq Pdf ViewerThe factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ Rosenstiel and Keefe 1. To date, with one exception Tuttle et al. CSQ have used the composite scores of its 8 a priori theoretically derived scales rather than the 4. An examination of the match between the 8 theoretically derived scales and scales empirically extracted from an item analysis is lacking. Accordingly, the CSQ was administered to 1. Factor analyses of the individual items revealed an 8 factor structure to be uninterpretabie. Of the 2 9 factor solutions tested, the 5 factor structure was the most interpretable Factor 1, Distraction Factor 2, Ignoring Pain Sensations Factor 3, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations Factor 4, Catastrophizing Factor 5, Praying and Hoping. Coping Strategies Questionnaire Csq Pdf' title='Coping Strategies Questionnaire Csq Pdf' />The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ. Pain Catastrophizing Scale PCS in an effort to develop a comprehensive. The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ Rosenstiel and Keefe 1983 is the most widely used measure of pain coping strategies. To date, with one exception Tuttle. Coping Strategies Questionnaire Csq Pdf' title='Coping Strategies Questionnaire Csq Pdf' />Abstract We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ. Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ Kausar Munir, 2004. CSQ measures four dimensions. Active practical coping consists of 16 items, active distractive coping. The 27item coping strategies questionnairerevised confirmatory factor. To develop an Italian version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. The CSQR was. Eighteen Ph. Enigma Tool Mercedes. D. or M. D. level clinicians classified items into their corresponding category with a high degree of accuracy on average, 9. Four subscales, Catastrophizing, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations, Praying and Hoping and to a lesser degree Ignoring Pain Sensations, correspond with parallel subscales proposed by Rosensteil and Keefe 1. The fifth subscale, Distraction, is comprised of items from their Diverting Attention and Increasing Activity Level subscales, suggesting that cognitive and behavioural distraction comprise 1 rather than 2 coping strategies. That CSQ items on the original Coping Self Statements and the Increasing Pain Behaviour subscales failed to load consistently on any factor suggests that they do not reliably measure distinct coping strategies. The 5 factor solution we obtained is very similar to that obtained by Tuttle et al.